Comments on: You Can’t Even Wrap Fish with an Online Newspaper http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/you-cant-even-wrap-fish-with-an-online-newspaper/ A Medley of Extemporanea Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:11:11 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Matt's mom http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/you-cant-even-wrap-fish-with-an-online-newspaper/#comment-384 Matt's mom Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:45:20 +0000 http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-384 John Edwards might well be (or have been) in consideration for Obama's v-p candidate. Some are saying this finishes his career, but some women I know have said, WHO CARES? about the affair--especially in view of John McCain's past peccadillos. (Or is that an Arizona dish featuring small mammals and hot peppers?) John Edwards might well be (or have been) in consideration for Obama’s v-p candidate. Some are saying this finishes his career, but some women I know have said, WHO CARES? about the affair–especially in view of John McCain’s past peccadillos. (Or is that an Arizona dish featuring small mammals and hot peppers?)

]]> By: Ben http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/you-cant-even-wrap-fish-with-an-online-newspaper/#comment-383 Ben Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:25:25 +0000 http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-383 I don't think the papers should have shied away from it because only the National Enquirer had reported it. Of all the tabloids, the Enquirer is actually fairly likely to base scandalous reports on fact. The papers should have downplayed the story because it's of only scandal value and Kaus (because he's basically shallow) has been hyping it even after it became totally uninteresting - scandal involving guy who isn't running for President! Oh noes! After reading this remarkable article in the LA Times by someone who knew the chickie involved: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-miller10-2008aug10,0,4015084.story I do think that the former Presidential candidate may have taken the title of "dumbest f--king guy on the planet" away from Doug Feith. Also, everybody who called Monica Lewinsky a bimbo owes her an apology. I don’t think the papers should have shied away from it because only the National Enquirer had reported it. Of all the tabloids, the Enquirer is actually fairly likely to base scandalous reports on fact. The papers should have downplayed the story because it’s of only scandal value and Kaus (because he’s basically shallow) has been hyping it even after it became totally uninteresting – scandal involving guy who isn’t running for President! Oh noes!

After reading this remarkable article in the LA Times by someone who knew the chickie involved: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-miller10-2008aug10,0,4015084.story
I do think that the former Presidential candidate may have taken the title of “dumbest f–king guy on the planet” away from Doug Feith. Also, everybody who called Monica Lewinsky a bimbo owes her an apology.

]]> By: Matt W http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/you-cant-even-wrap-fish-with-an-online-newspaper/#comment-382 Matt W Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:26:22 +0000 http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-382 Sure, but that doesn't excuse the 'journalists' who thought that papers should be reporting this story when it was still a <i>National Enquirer</i> exclusive. Sure, but that doesn’t excuse the ‘journalists’ who thought that papers should be reporting this story when it was still a National Enquirer exclusive.

]]> By: Matt's mom http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/you-cant-even-wrap-fish-with-an-online-newspaper/#comment-381 Matt's mom Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:44:02 +0000 http://saucersofmud.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-381 This just in--the politician admits the affair, not the baby. This just in–the politician admits the affair, not the baby.

]]>